Don't Let Me Get Carried Away

DOT’S FMCSA’S CDL VERSES PHMSA’S HMR TRAINING

What’s the difference between the 49 CFR Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Commercial Driver License (CDL), hazmat endorsement and the 49 CFR Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety Administration (PHMSA), hazmat employee training requirements? 

First, many confuse the definition of hazardous material under the Department of Transportation (DOT). Many use the word interchangeably however, some don’t realize that PHMSA and FMCSA have very different meanings. Under the FMCSR, a hazardous material is a material for which placarding is required under 49 CFR 172.500, but under the PHMSA it is any amount of a hazardous material in 171.8.

Though I am no expert on the FMCSA, I do know that drivers require hazmat endorsements on their Commercial Driver License (CDL), if they want to accept FMCSA hazardous materials (placarded shipments for transportation). However, this should not be confused with the requirement that all hazmat employees, including drivers, are required to meet all four levels of training under the PHMSA 49 CFR 172.700 training requirements, General awareness, Function specific, Safety and Security training regardless of whether the hazardous material shipment requires placards or not.

As stated in this PHMSA Letter of Interpretation; 

“This training must include general awareness, function-specific, safety, and security awareness training as specified in §172.704(a) of the HMR, as well as driver training in the applicable requirements of FMCSA Regulations (FMCSR; 49 CFR parts 390 through 397) and the procedures necessary for the safe operation of that motor vehicle.” 

Barely able to maintain a regular driver license, let alone a CDL and a hazardous materials endorsement, I would be misleading you to suggest that I am aware of what is covered in any of the state training, testing and certification requirements to achieve a FMCSA CDL endorsement. 

However, I am pretty sure many of the FMCSA sanctioned state certifications have very little to do with the training and documentation requirements under PHMSA, in 172.700, By simply passing the state’s CDL hazardous material endorsement test in most cases will fall well short of meeting the federal PHMSA  training, testing, certification and documentation requirements.

But, I’ve been wrong before. So don’t take my word for it, check your driver’s FMCSA, CDL hazmat certification endorsement records, because to meet the PHMSA hazmat employee training requirement their records must include: 

(1) The hazmat employee's name; 
(2) The most recent training completion date of the hazmat employee's training; 
(3) A description, copy, or the location of the training materials used to meet the training  requirements; 
(4) The name and address of the person providing the training. and;
(5) Certification that the hazmat employee has been trained and tested on the following;

General awareness and Familiarization training, designed to provide familiarity and to enable the employee to recognize and identify hazardous materials consistent with the HMR communication standard,

Function-specific training concerning the requirements of the HMR, ICAO or IMDG that are specific to the functions the employee performs. 

Safety training concerning the Emergency Response Information required by 172.600, about the specific measures the hazmat employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure, including the methods and procedures for avoiding accidents, such as the proper procedures for handling packages containing hazardous materials, and;

Security Awareness training of security risks associated with hazardous materials transportation and methods designed to enhance transportation security.  Then In-depth Security training for hazmat employers required to have a security plan, in 172.800. The In-depth Security training must include company security objectives, organizational security structure, specific security procedures, specific security duties and responsibilities for each employee, and specific actions to be taken by each employee in the event of a security breach. 

These records and certifications are critical as all hazmat employers, both shippers/generators and carriers/transporters must make the PHMSA hazmat employee's current training records available upon request, to authorized officials of the Department of Transportation. 

Remember, we are always here for you. If you have a related question or problem please call us. And don’t forget the 2021/2022 Hazardous Materials Substances and Wastes Compliance Guide Books are still available or you can sign up for our next seminar and secure a copy for yourself.

Be Safe!

Robert J. Keegan
Publisher and President
Hazardous Materials Publishing Company
Transportation Skills Programs Inc.
hazmat-tsp.com


Be Safe!

Robert J. Keegan
Publisher and President
Hazardous Materials Publishing Company
Transportation Skills Programs Inc.
hazmat-tsp.com



WHY DID THE FIFTY-FIVE GALLON DRUM CROSS THE ROAD?

Surely, taking a 55 gallon drum across a street does not trigger full compliance with the 49 CFR Department of Transportation (DOT), Hazardous Material Regulations? Yes, and I will not call you Shirley anymore. 

That seems to be the interpretation from the DOT Hazardous Materials Hotline (800-467-4922).  Backing this up is Subchapter I, Part 171, Section 171.1, Paragraph (d), in Sub-Paragraph (4). Or more simply in 171.1(d)(4). So, as my 2 year old granddaughter, Jolene likes to say,

 “Of course”.

“Rail and motor vehicle movements of a hazardous material exclusively within a contiguous facility boundary where public access is restricted, except to the extent that the movement is on or crosses a public road or is on track that is part of the general railroad system of transportation, unless access to the public road is restricted by signals, lights, gates, or similar controls.”

This would include any hazardous material container with residue, crossing a public road. They may not require hazardous materials shipping papers, or placards on the trucks for non-bulk 172.505 table to non-bulk containers, i.e. drum in 173.29(c). There is no exception for bulk containers over 119 gallons each or 882 pounds, fully regulated period. This would include forklifts. I am no expert on the DOT Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations. Could this trigger the requirements for commercial drivers license (CDL) with the hazardous materials endorsement for bulk containers like ICB or the totes?

Lock this down. If discovered or there is an accident, DOT might feel you willfully violated the requirements. That’s no joke.

Robert J Keegan

Publisher and President

Hazardous Materials Publishing Company

Transportation Skills Programs Inc.


STEEL IS IN MY BLOOD

In the 1970’s, I labored in fields of frozen steel drilling pipe, south of Edmonton, Alberta, running x-ray inspection machinery with my older brother Tim, then as a steelworker in a rolling mill that welded steel into pipes serviced to drilled and carry crude from Alaska’s North Slope to the Port of Valdez. Next month we have two live, on-line steel mill in-house seminars, and my first pickup truck was made of steel.

Don’t worry this is not about steel
It’s about 40 CFR Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),  hazardous waste when shipped for disposal as a  49 CFR Department of Transportation, (DOT), Class 9 miscellaneous hazardous material.

DOT hazardous materials regulations make clear that only after a shipper or generator matches a hazardous material’s hazard classes, packing group and hazard labels, are they authorized to select the correct Pure Chemical, End-use, Specific n.o.s. or Generic n.o.s. proper shipping name

So if that is the case, the NA3077 Hazardous Waste, Solid n.o.s. 9, PG III’s specific shipping name is more descriptive than UN3077 Waste Environmentally Hazardous Substance, Solid n.o.s, 9, PG III’s generic shipping name, for domestic shipments of hazardous waste that meet no hazard classification under DOT, like EPA sludge or baghouse toxic hazardous waste (K061), from the production of steel in electrical furnaces.

There are three times and up to six chemicals or waste codes that could be required to be listed, in association with some hazardous material shipping descriptions. The first, in 172.203(c) for the top 2 hazardous substances with lowest value, (“RQ”). The second, in 173.203(k) for the top 2 most dangerous chemicals, when a “G” appears in column number 1 of the 172.101 Hazardous Materials Table, and finally in 172.203(l) the top 2 marine pollutants, in bulk containers and water shipments.

40 CFR EPA 261.32 
Hazardous Waste From Specific Sources

EPA, (K061) baghouse hazardous waste produced from the production of steel in electric furnaces, is a 49 CFR Departmental of Transportation (DOT) hazardous material and is shipped for disposal as a 173.140, Class 9 miscellaneous hazardous material as it does not meet a hazard class definition and would not be regulated as a DOT hazardous material when shipped, if not for the fact that it is a EPA toxic waste and a hazardous substance (“RQ”) with a value of 10 pounds for each container.

I think both shipping names would be legal for a (K061) on a waste manifest. However, the international shipping name with the UN3077 number would not fall under the exception listed below. So, what does that mean? It means if you were to use the domestic NA3077 shipping name you would not have to list the top two chemicals in your (K061) waste that make it dangerous, only waste codes like (K061).

As the 40 CFR 172.203(k) exception states, the provisions of paragraph (k) do not apply to a material that is a hazardous waste and described using the proper shipping name “Hazardous waste, liquid or solid, n.o.s.”, classed as a miscellaneous Class 9, provided the EPA hazardous waste number is included on the shipping paper in association with the basic description.

RQ, NA3077, Hazardous Waste, Solid n.o.s. 9, PG III, (K061)

By using the domestic NA3077 shipping name and listing the waste codes, you could meet both requirements in 172.203(k), the names of the top two most dangerous hazardous materials and (c), the names of the top two hazardous substances with lowest value, which again would conclude me to believe that the NA 3077, Hazardous waste, solid n.o.s., would be more appropriate as  172.203(c) states that waste codes like (K061) may be used to identify the name of the hazardous substances.

One last note. Check out column 7 of the 172.101 Hazardous Materials Table for the two shipping names we’ve been discussing here. You might notice that some of the special provisions in 172.102 are the same, like “B45” for bulk containers, “IB8” for IBC containers and “T1” for tanks, but others are not. Be careful when selecting one shipping name over another; it might restrict you to certain types of containers in different modes or have additional requirements based on domestic regulations or international recommendations.

But, that’s not the reason that steel is in my blood. It's hereditary, my mother is made of titanium.

Thank you for your support.

Robert J. Keegan

Publisher and President

Hazardous Materials Publishing Company

Transportation Skills Programs Inc

hazmat.tsp@gmail.com

610-587-3978 






COMMANDER “Slash” COORDINATOR

COMMANDER /COORDINATOR

There is a funny scene in the movie Zoolander, when an overjoyed Fábio thanks the award show audience for the best Actor “Slash” Model Award and not the other way around. It reminds me of differences between an “On-Scene Commander “Slash” Emergency Coordinator”

THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 
AND SAFETY ADMINISTRATION (OSHA) 
29 CFR 1910.120
 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE
ON-SCENE COMMANDER

OSHA On-scene incident commanders are required by employers to protect Hazmat teams from exposure during unintentional hazardous substance releases under 29 CFR 1910.120 Hazardous waste operations and emergency response.

Worker Protection

OSHA On-scene incident commanders protect workers and assume control of a hazardous substance release or an incident scene. They must understand and be able to implement the employer's Emergency Response Plan and their Incident Command System (ICS). They must know how to implement the Local and State Emergency Response Plans. In addition they need to understand the hazards and the risks associated with employees working in chemical protective clothing and understand the importance of decontamination procedures.

THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
(EPA) 40 CFR  Part 262 
HAZARDOUS WASTE 
EMERGENCY COORDINATOR

EPA Emergency coordinators are required to protect the environment in and around Large Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator Facilities (LQG), 40 CFR 262.264 during emergencies involving their hazardous waste.  

Environmental Protection

EPA’s 40 CFR 262.264 requires that Large Quantity Hazardous Waste Generators (LQG), have Emergency Coordinators on site or on call to respond in a short period of time to hazardous waste emergencies to protect the environment, by coordinating and implementing the LQG’s Contingency Plan. Emergency coordinators must be thoroughly familiar with all aspects of the generator's hazardous waste contingency plan, all hazardous waste operations and activities at the facility, the location and characteristics of all hazardous waste handled, the location of all relevant records within the facility, and the facility's layout. In addition, this person must have the authority to commit the resources needed to carry out the employer's written LQG hazardous waste contingency plan.

If these both sound similar or almost the same you’re probably starting to get it. But they aren't. OSHA will not ask about your emergency coordinators, nor will EPA ask about your on-scene commanders, unless they are the same person. 

DOWNLOAD THE EPA/DOT/OSHA ONE PLAN
HERE

Many years ago I modeled for my father, as disturbing as that may sound, in the early hazardous materials seminar training programs he photographed, produced and presented. My brothers and I were used as actors “slash” models to portray the drivers and dock personnel, passing shipping papers and placards. But don't worry, I am not holding out for any peer recognition, even if there is a Zoolander III.

Get it right, now! Sign up for new Hazmat Rob’s Newsletter with the free “DOT / EPA / OSHA Regulatory Update Service” and Rob’s blog with our subscribe button to the right.

Robert J. Keegan

Publisher and President

Hazardous Materials Publishing Company

Transportation Skills Programs Inc.

hazmat.tsp@gmail.com



Dumpster Fire

1.png

IS YOUR SOLID WASTE HAZARDOUS

There is no requirement under the 40 CFR Environmental Protection Agency Regulations to test any unwanted material that is Listed or to insure that it is Ignitable, Corrosive, Reactive or Toxic hazardous waste. The requirement is to properly identify, manage and disposed certain solid wastes as hazardous waste

“The hazardous waste determination for each solid waste must be made at the point of waste generation, before any dilution, mixing, or other alteration of the waste occurs,” 40 CFR 262.11(a)

Listed Hazardous Waste

It’s listed, in 40 CFR, Sections 261.31 through 261.33 , that’s the point, it’s listed for a reason. These are a select group of used solvents, processes that tend to generate questionable wastes and discarded or unusable pure chemicals that are, (with the exception of F003), always hazardous waste as F-coded, K-coded, P-coded and U-coded respectively. Once your waste is listed there’s really no reason to test it, unless you’re going for an exclusion.

Because, if the solid waste is listed, but does not meet a hazardous waste characteristic a person may file a petition for delisting in Section 260.22 by demonstrating to the Administrator that the waste from this particular site or operation is not hazardous. 

So for listed waste in 261.31 through 261.33, EPA in 40 CFR 262.11 requires that hazardous waste determination and record-keeping at the very least, must include the solid waste’s origin, composition, process, feedstocks, and any other reliable and relevant information. 

Characteristic Hazardous Waste 

For characteristic D-coded hazardous waste the generators may apply the materials, constituents, their uses and the processes used to generate waste. In that, the identification of hazardous waste in 40 CFR 261.21 for ignitable, 261.22 for corrosive and 262.23 reactivity and 261.24 toxicity, can include process knowledge, feedstocks and other inputs to the production process, knowledge of products, by-products, intermediates produced during the manufacturing, chemical or physical characterization and other properties of the waste.

However, if the generator’s knowledge is inadequate to make a proper determination for characteristic waste, the person must test the waste according to the Subpart C of 40 CFR Part 261 Characteristics of Hazardous Waste in Sections 261.21 ignitable, 261.22, corrosive, 261.23 reactivity and 261.24 toxic.

Even very Small Quantity Generators (VSQG) under 40 CFR 262.14  are required to identify and record their solid waste as hazardous under the 40 CFR 262.10(a)(1)(i) Independent requirements to ensure proper generator status compliance.

So, yeah generators can use generator waste knowledge to identify your solid waste as hazardous waste. However, If you’re asking me if you can use generator waste knowledge to identify your solid waste as non-hazardous?  Again sure, but now if you’re wrong, in other words your waste determination is not correct, for every container, you're in violation.

The brand new 2021/2022 Hazardous Materials, Substances and Wastes Compliance Guide is now available for shipping and included in your training kit at The Live Zoom Hazardous Materials, Substances and Waste Compliance Seminar

Looking forward to seeing you soon.

Thank you for your support.

Be safe.

Robert J. Keegan

Publisher and President 

Hazardous Materials Publishing Company

Transportation Skills Programs

Hazmat.tsp@gmail.com